Families whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.
The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.
A recent report on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.
“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”
Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.
One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.
“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”
“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”
Further up the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.
“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”
In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”
An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.
Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.
“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”
A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”
He added there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”
“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”
The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.
Lina is a seasoned casino reviewer with over a decade of experience in the gambling industry.